Share
VIDEOS 1 TO 50
Wikipedia Action Semantics
Wikipedia Action Semantics
Published: 2017/02/18
Channel: Clint Ortega
Semantics in Action for Proactive Policing
Semantics in Action for Proactive Policing
Published: 2017/06/26
Channel: MarkLogic
[Wikipedia] Action semantics
[Wikipedia] Action semantics
Published: 2017/02/06
Channel: WikiTubia
Semantic Analysis Phase : Introduction
Semantic Analysis Phase : Introduction
Published: 2014/04/06
Channel: Go GATE IIT
Semantics in Action via Services and Policies
Semantics in Action via Services and Policies
Published: 2016/08/17
Channel: Microsoft Research
S. I. Hayakawa - Why General Semantics (1968)
S. I. Hayakawa - Why General Semantics (1968)
Published: 2016/09/28
Channel: Biophily2
Semantics in Action with Semaphore 4 - Webinar
Semantics in Action with Semaphore 4 - Webinar
Published: 2017/09/13
Channel: Smartlogic
CDC: Convolutional-De-Convolutional Networks for Precise Temporal Action...
CDC: Convolutional-De-Convolutional Networks for Precise Temporal Action...
Published: 2017/07/30
Channel: ComputerVisionFoundation Videos
The SAM Pattern: a distributed system view of Front-End architectures by Jean-Jacques Dubray
The SAM Pattern: a distributed system view of Front-End architectures by Jean-Jacques Dubray
Published: 2016/06/23
Channel: Next Day Video
It
It's just semantics 2
Published: 2017/01/23
Channel: MLink
Visual Inertial Semantic Scene Representation for 3D Object Detection
Visual Inertial Semantic Scene Representation for 3D Object Detection
Published: 2017/03/09
Channel: Jingming Dong
Deep Natural Language Semantics - Raymond Mooney
Deep Natural Language Semantics - Raymond Mooney
Published: 2014/11/26
Channel: Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (AI2)
CS101: The Semantic Web (Lecture 22)
CS101: The Semantic Web (Lecture 22)
Published: 2016/01/12
Channel: Tarah Wheeler
"It
"It's just semantics" | Highlight Reel
Published: 2016/11/24
Channel: The10thProduction
Probabilistic Action Cores - Inference with Markov Logic Networks
Probabilistic Action Cores - Inference with Markov Logic Networks
Published: 2014/10/10
Channel: agkiunibremen
PAUL RICOEUR:  ARISTOTLE
PAUL RICOEUR: ARISTOTLE'S "SEMANTICS OF ACTION"
Published: 2015/04/30
Channel: abballard
Semantic Gradients
Semantic Gradients
Published: 2011/07/01
Channel: Reading Rockets
Real-time Action Recognition by Spatiotemporal Semantic and Structural Forest
Real-time Action Recognition by Spatiotemporal Semantic and Structural Forest
Published: 2010/07/25
Channel: bmvc2010s251
Planetside 2 Leadership Tactics: Semantics
Planetside 2 Leadership Tactics: Semantics
Published: 2013/07/28
Channel: Attlas: The Charlatan Wonder
Getting the Most from MarkLogic Semantics
Getting the Most from MarkLogic Semantics
Published: 2017/06/26
Channel: MarkLogic
"GS Lite: A Consideration of S. I. Hayakawa" - Gerald Haslam - 2012 General Semantics Symposium
"GS Lite: A Consideration of S. I. Hayakawa" - Gerald Haslam - 2012 General Semantics Symposium
Published: 2012/11/25
Channel: InstituteofGS
Mary P. Lahman - "Awareness and Action: A General Semantics Approach to Effective Language Behavior"
Mary P. Lahman - "Awareness and Action: A General Semantics Approach to Effective Language Behavior"
Published: 2016/01/29
Channel: InstituteofGS
ICNet for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation on High-Resolution Images
ICNet for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation on High-Resolution Images
Published: 2017/04/25
Channel: Hengshuang Zhao
C++11 Move Semantics
C++11 Move Semantics
Published: 2017/04/09
Channel: oneproduct
Sandwich semantics
Sandwich semantics
Published: 2016/06/02
Channel: David Cade
Prof. Srini Narayanan | Simulation Semantics
Prof. Srini Narayanan | Simulation Semantics
Published: 2014/08/03
Channel: EUCog Network
Intensional Meaning in Semantics
Intensional Meaning in Semantics
Published: 2017/04/20
Channel: John Calhoun
Web semantics tutorial: Appreciating the value of the semantic web | lynda.com
Web semantics tutorial: Appreciating the value of the semantic web | lynda.com
Published: 2013/11/05
Channel: LinkedIn Learning Solutions
Lecture 2a - Word Level Semantics [Ed Grefenstette]
Lecture 2a - Word Level Semantics [Ed Grefenstette]
Published: 2017/02/09
Channel: Zafarullah Mahmood
Semantics (HP users beware)
Semantics (HP users beware)
Published: 2017/08/29
Channel: Brother Shaw
Semantics in Halo, Halo Reach, Gameplay
Semantics in Halo, Halo Reach, Gameplay
Published: 2015/03/14
Channel: Cass
Semantic Extraction in Slow Motion
Semantic Extraction in Slow Motion
Published: 2011/07/28
Channel: joinvision
Dark Souls - The Semantics of Festering Dick Piles - Finale? - DoTheGames
Dark Souls - The Semantics of Festering Dick Piles - Finale? - DoTheGames
Published: 2012/12/22
Channel: JimAndNathanDoTheGames
Generation Kill: Lt. Col. Stephen "Godfather" Ferrando (HBO)
Generation Kill: Lt. Col. Stephen "Godfather" Ferrando (HBO)
Published: 2008/06/26
Channel: HBO
SemanticFusion:  Dense 3D Semantic Mapping with Convolutional Neural Networks
SemanticFusion: Dense 3D Semantic Mapping with Convolutional Neural Networks
Published: 2016/09/20
Channel: John McCormac
CppCon 2015: John Lakos “Value Semantics: It ain
CppCon 2015: John Lakos “Value Semantics: It ain't about the syntax!, Part I"
Published: 2015/10/16
Channel: CppCon
Compiler Design lecture: Semantic Analysis, various Phases of compiler | 15
Compiler Design lecture: Semantic Analysis, various Phases of compiler | 15
Published: 2015/08/17
Channel: Gate Instructors
Web 3.0, Linked Data, and the Semantic Web: What
Web 3.0, Linked Data, and the Semantic Web: What's this all about?
Published: 2016/09/06
Channel: Microsoft Research
Obama admin plays
Obama admin plays 'combat' semantics in deadly Afghan attack
Published: 2016/01/06
Channel: Fox News
The Millennial Rock - Semantics (Official Music Video)
The Millennial Rock - Semantics (Official Music Video)
Published: 2017/08/18
Channel: Semantics The Band
Refugee by The Welsh Semantics
Refugee by The Welsh Semantics
Published: 2016/07/22
Channel: The Welsh Semantics
Cinema Semantics Episode 6: National Treasure and Return to Form
Cinema Semantics Episode 6: National Treasure and Return to Form
Published: 2011/11/22
Channel: TheTigerwolf55
Semantic Feature Analysis Approach
Semantic Feature Analysis Approach
Published: 2014/10/18
Channel: Hillary Harbaugh
Professor Irwin Corey at the Cutting Room NYC
Professor Irwin Corey at the Cutting Room NYC
Published: 2008/07/23
Channel: Jane GussinTV
Geo-semantic Segmentation (CVPR 2015)
Geo-semantic Segmentation (CVPR 2015)
Published: 2015/05/29
Channel: UCF CRCV
Integrating physics-based Prediction with Semantic Plan Execution Monitoring
Integrating physics-based Prediction with Semantic Plan Execution Monitoring
Published: 2015/03/09
Channel: Sebastian Rockel
Introducing Exactly Once Semantics in Apache Kafka with Matthias J. Sax
Introducing Exactly Once Semantics in Apache Kafka with Matthias J. Sax
Published: 2017/06/14
Channel: Databricks
Shower Thoughts (On Semantics and Puns)
Shower Thoughts (On Semantics and Puns)
Published: 2017/05/23
Channel: Starfruit Studios
Listen closely to the semantics of Mayor Anderson
Listen closely to the semantics of Mayor Anderson
Published: 2009/02/21
Channel: momsagainstjimdahl
The Meaning of "Ouch" and "Oops" with David Kaplan
The Meaning of "Ouch" and "Oops" with David Kaplan
Published: 2008/04/25
Channel: University of California Television (UCTV)
NEXT
GO TO RESULTS [51 .. 100]

WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Action semantics is a framework for the formal specification of semantics of programming languages invented by David Watt and Peter D. Mosses in the 1990s. It is a mixture of denotational, operational and algebraic semantics.

Action Semantics aims to be pragmatic. Action-Semantic Descriptions (ASDs) are designed to scale up to handle realistic programming languages. This is aided by the extensibility and modifiability of ASDs. This helps to ensure that extensions and changes do not require too many changes in the description. This is in contrast to the typical case when extending denotational or operational semantics, which may require reformulation of the entire description.

The Action Semantics framework was originally developed at the University of Aarhus and the University of Glasgow. Groups and individuals around the world have since contributed further to the approach.

Semantic entities[edit]

An important part of action semantics that gives it a modularity not seen in previous programming language semantics is the use of first-order semantic entities. First-order refers to how, unlike in denotational semantics, where a semantic function can be applied to another semantic function, in action semantics, a semantic entity cannot be applied to another semantic entity of its kind.[1] Furthermore, the semantic entities utilized by action semantics broaden the framework’s ability to describe a programming language’s constructs by serving to denote both program behavior that is independent of any particular implementation and the way in which parts of a program influence the overall performance of the whole. The appropriately named action notation is employed to express the three types of semantic entities found in action semantics: actions, data, and yielders. The central semantic entity in this framework is actions, with data and yielders occupying supplementary roles.[2] More specifically, actions are the mechanisms through which yielders and data are processed.[1] An action, which can occur within another action, is a step-by-step representation of program behavior, where each step accesses current information, changes current information, or does both. Yielders appear within actions and only access current information. A yielder entity is capable of being evaluated, and when it is, the product is a datum entity.[2]

Action entities[edit]

Action entities can directly represent programs’ semantics by describing possible program behaviors or represent, in a more indirect way, the impact that individual pieces of a program, like statements or expressions, have on the semantics of the program as a whole.[2] They model computational behavior by indicating changes in state through their generation of new values from passed values. Specifically, an action accepts data passed to it via the current information — the transient data given to it, the bindings received by it, and the current state of storage — and, from this, gives new transient data, creates new bindings, updates the state of storage, or any combination of these.[1] An action entity can culminate in three possible ways. It can: complete (terminate normally), escape (terminate in an exception), fail (alternative is discarded), or diverge (not terminate).[2]

There are four categories of information that are processed by action performance. Transient information corresponds to intermediate results and is accessible for immediate use by the action.[2] The data that comprises transient information encompasses the values given by expressions. If these values are not immediately used, they are lost.[1] Scoped information corresponds to symbol tables and can be referenced from anywhere within the action and its sub-actions.[2] It is also possible for such information to be hidden within a sub-action, via the creation of an inner scope, in which case it would be only locally accessible within that scope, to that sub-action.[1] Stable information corresponds to values assigned to variables and can be modified in the action performance.[2] Because alterations to storage during the performance of an action are persistent, only explicit actions can cause such modifications.[1] In accordance with this, stable information is available until it is explicitly destroyed. And, unlike scoped information, it cannot be hidden. Permanent information corresponds to data exchanged between actions and can be extended but not modified. Transient information is produced only when an action completes or escapes, and scoped information is produced only when an action completes. The modification of stable information and the extension of permanent information must take place during action performance.[2]

An action entity has five different facets, one for processing that does not rely on information, and four for processing each of the four different types of information. The basic facet, an example of which would be control flows, is not tied to information of any kind. The functional facet deals with the processing of transient information and is characterized by actions giving and accepting data. The declarative facet deals with the processing of scoped information and is characterized by actions creating and receiving bindings. The imperative facet deals with the processing of stable information and is characterized by actions allocating and freeing storage cells, and fetching and modifying the data stored in them. The communicative facet deals with processing permanent information and is characterized by actions sending and receiving messages and “offer[ing] contracts to agents.”[2] There are two different kinds of actions in terms of their effect on the information in each facet. Primitive actions only affect the information in one facet. Action combinators permit actions that involve multiple facets, governing how control and information flows for each facet involved in a combined action.[2] In combining actions, action combinators governor the sequencing of sub-action performances and the incoming and outgoing flows of data for each sub-action.[1]

Data entities[edit]

Data entities are the items that comprise the information processed in action entities. The data is arranged into structures known as sorts. Sorts are sets of mathematical objects, include operations that can be performed on those objects, and are defined according to algebraic criteria.[1] These structures allow access to each individual entity. Examples of data entities can include concrete elements like maps, lists, sets, strings, characters, numbers, and truth values, more abstract elements used solely for the purpose of some computational operation, namely data access, like agents, cells corresponding to memory locations, and tokens, or elements like contracts and messages that are a composite of data components.[2] An abstraction is a data entity that encapsulates an action entity, in which case enacting the abstraction results in the action being performed. This is the technique by which action semantics represents the declaring and invoking of subprograms.[1]

Yielder entities[edit]

Yielder entities consist of unevaluated quantities of data. The values of these quantities are contingent on the current information and state of computation. Yielders draw on transient data, bindings, and storage to select the information to be processed by actions.[1] It is during action performance that yielders are evaluated, and their evaluation results in data entities. While the current information can influence the data produced by the evaluation of a yielder entity, the evaluation cannot influence the current information. If data operations are employed on yielder entities, compound yielder entities may be formed as a result.[2]

Action notation[edit]

Regular English words serve as the symbols of action notation. Action notation is designed to simulate natural language, which is illustrated in the parts of speech used to denote semantic entities. Action entities are represented by verb phrases and data and yielder entities by noun phrases. The result of this choice of symbols is a framework that is highly readable and no less formal than other frameworks since it remains precisely defined.[2]

Other key aspects[edit]

Action semantics embodies a level of abstraction that increases its comprehensibility. The specifics of the control and data flows that an action involves are implicitly incorporated in the action, as opposed to being explicitly expressed as the details of semantic functions are in denotational semantics. When an action is performed, most information processing and manipulation occurs automatically.[1]

Program phrases are mapped to actions when constructing a definition of a programming language’s meaning in action semantics. The execution of a programming phrase corresponds to the performance of the action to which it maps.[1]

The programming language specification generated from the application of action semantics can be broken down into a lower level (microsemantics) and an upper level (marcosemantics). The lower level consists of defining the meaning of action notation, while the upper level consists of defining the meaning of a programming language, using action notation to do so.[1]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Kenneth Slonneger and Barry L. Kurtz (1995) Formal Syntax and Semantics of Programming Languages: A Laboratory Based Approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, .
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Peter D. Mosses (1996) Theory and Practice of Action Semantics. Publication. Aarhus, DK: University of Aarhus, 1996. BRICS Report Series RS9653.

Disclaimer

None of the audio/visual content is hosted on this site. All media is embedded from other sites such as GoogleVideo, Wikipedia, YouTube etc. Therefore, this site has no control over the copyright issues of the streaming media.

All issues concerning copyright violations should be aimed at the sites hosting the material. This site does not host any of the streaming media and the owner has not uploaded any of the material to the video hosting servers. Anyone can find the same content on Google Video or YouTube by themselves.

The owner of this site cannot know which documentaries are in public domain, which has been uploaded to e.g. YouTube by the owner and which has been uploaded without permission. The copyright owner must contact the source if he wants his material off the Internet completely.

Powered by YouTube
Wikipedia content is licensed under the GFDL and (CC) license