Share

WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Comparison of application servers)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This list compares the features and functionality of application servers, grouped by the hosting environment that is offered by that particular application server.

BASIC[edit]

  • Run BASIC - An all-in-one BASIC scriptable application server, can automatically manage session and state

C[edit]

  • Lwan[1] - Small-footprint, highly-scalable web server.
  • RomPager AE[2] - Engineered for IoT and Embedded Systems, Highly-scalable embedded web-server.
  • Enduro/X - A middleware platform for distributed transaction processing, based on XATMI and XA standards, open source, C API

C++[edit]

  • Tuxedo - Based on the ATMI standard, is one of the original application servers.
  • Tntnet - Includes a template engine which allows embedding C++ code in HTML pages. Templates are compiled before run-time, and thus very fast. Multi-threaded, supports object lifetime via scoped variables.
  • CPPSERV - C++ servlet container.
  • Wt - A web toolkit similar to Qt permitting GUI-application-like web development with built-in Ajax abilities.
  • POCO C++ Libraries - A set of open source class libraries including Poco.Net.HTTPServer.html
  • CppCMS
  • uWSGI[3]
  • Enduro/X - A middleware platform for distributed transaction processing, based on XATMI and XA standards, open source

Go[edit]

  • Enduro/X ASG - Application server for Go. This provides XATMI and XA facilities for Golang. Go application can be built by normal Go executable files which in turn provides stateless services, which can be load balanced, clustered and reloaded on they fly with out service interruption by means of administrative work only. Framework provides distributed transaction processing facility for Go.

Haskell[edit]

Java[edit]

Product Vendor Edition Last release Java EE
compatibility [4]
Servlet JSP HTTP/2 License
ColdFusion Adobe Systems 2016.0.1 2016-05-01 7 partial platform 3.1 2.3 No Proprietary, commercial
Enhydra Lutris 5.1.9 2005-03-23 No No Free, GPL
Enterprise Server Borland 6.7 2007-01 1.4 2.4 2.0 No Proprietary, commercial
Geronimo ASF 3.0.1 2013-05-28 6 full platform 3.0 2.2 No Free, Apache
GlassFish GlassFish Community 5.0.0 2017-09-21 8 full platform 4.0 2.3 No Free, CDDL, GPL + classpath exception
iPlanet Web Server Oracle Corporation 7.0.21 2015-04 Yes[5] 2.5 2.1 No Proprietary, commercial
JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Red Hat 7.1.3 2018-06 7 full platform 3.1 2.3 Yes Free, LGPL
Jetty Eclipse Foundation 9.4.10 2018-05-10 7 partial platform[6] 3.1 2.3 Yes Free, Apache 2.0, EPL
JEUS TmaxSoft 8 2013-08 7 full platform 3.0 2.2 No Proprietary, commercial
JOnAS OW2 Consortium

(formerly ObjectWeb)

5.3 2013-10-04 6 Web Profile 3.0 2.2 No Free, LGPL
JRun Adobe Systems 4 updater 7 2007-11-06 1.3 3.1 2.3 No Proprietary, commercial
Lucee (Formerly Railo) Lucee Association Switzerland 5.2.5.25 2017-12-22 7 partial platform 3.1 2.3 No Free, CDDL, GPL + classpath exception
NetWeaver Application Server SAP AG 7.4 2013-01-11 5 2.5 2.1 No Proprietary, commercial
Oracle Containers for J2EE Oracle Corporation 10.1.3.5.0 2009-08 1.4 2.4 2.0 No Proprietary, commercial
Orion Application Server IronFlare 2.0.7 2006-03-09 1.3 2.3 1.2 No Proprietary, commercial
Payara Payara 4.1.2.181 2018-02-12 7 full platform 3.1 2.3 No Free, CDDL, GPL + classpath exception
Resin Servlet Container (open source) Caucho Technology 4.0.57 2018-06-25 6 Web Profile[7] 3.0 2.2 No Free, GPL
Resin Professional Application Server Caucho Technology 4.0.57 2018-06-25 6 Web Profile 3.0 2.2 No Proprietary, commercial
Rupy Rupy 1.2 2015-01-01 No No Free, LGPL
Tomcat ASF 9.0.8 2018-05-03 8 partial platform 4.0 2.3 Yes Free, Apache v2
TomEE ASF 1.7.5 2017-10 6 Web Profile 3.0 2.2 No Free, Apache
WebLogic Server Oracle Corporation

(formerly BEA Systems)

12.2.1.1 2016-06-21 [8] 7 full platform 3.1 2.3 No Proprietary, commercial
WebObjects Apple Inc. 5.4.3 2008-09-15 Partial[9] No Proprietary, commercial
IBM WebSphere Application Server IBM 9.0 2016-06-24 6 & 7 full platform 3.1 2.3 No Proprietary, commercial
WebSphere AS Community Edition IBM 3.0.0.4 2013-06-21 6 full platform 3.0 2.2 No Proprietary, commercial
WildFly

(formerly JBoss AS)

Red Hat

(formerly JBoss)

14.0.0.Final 2018-08-31 8 full platform 4.0 2.3 Yes Free, LGPL

JavaScript[edit]

  • Broadvision - Server-side JavaScript AS. One of the early entrants in the market during the eCommerce dot-com bubble, they have vertical solution packages catering to the eCommerce industry.
  • Wakanda Server - Server-side JavaScript application server integrating a NoSQL database engine (WakandaDB[10]), a dedicated HTTP server, user, and group management and an optional client-side JavaScript framework.
  • Node.js - implements Google's V8 engine as a standalone (outside the browser) asynchronous Javascript interpreter. A vigorous open-source developer community on GitHub has implemented many supporting products, notably npm for package management and Connect and Express app server layers.
  • Phusion Passenger
  • Jsish a JavaScript engine with type-checking modelled after Tcl.

LPC[edit]

Lua[edit]

.NET[edit]

Microsoft[edit]

Microsoft positions their middle-tier applications and services infrastructure in the Windows Server operating system and the .NET Framework technologies in the role of an application server:

Third-party[edit]

Objective-C[edit]

  • GNUstepWeb - WebObjects 4.5 compatible, licensed under LGPL
  • SOPE - Used as basis for groupware product SoGo

Python[edit]

Perl[edit]

PHP[edit]

Ruby[edit]

Smalltalk[edit]

  • Seaside - A continuations based web application server

Tcl[edit]

  • AOLserver - Forked from NaviServer after developer was bought by AOL in 1995
  • NaviServer - Resumed independent development after AOL dropped AOLserver support.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Disclaimer

None of the audio/visual content is hosted on this site. All media is embedded from other sites such as GoogleVideo, Wikipedia, YouTube etc. Therefore, this site has no control over the copyright issues of the streaming media.

All issues concerning copyright violations should be aimed at the sites hosting the material. This site does not host any of the streaming media and the owner has not uploaded any of the material to the video hosting servers. Anyone can find the same content on Google Video or YouTube by themselves.

The owner of this site cannot know which documentaries are in public domain, which has been uploaded to e.g. YouTube by the owner and which has been uploaded without permission. The copyright owner must contact the source if he wants his material off the Internet completely.

Powered by YouTube
Wikipedia content is licensed under the GFDL and (CC) license