Contingency Table Chi-Square Test

Channel: khanacademy   |   2010/11/11
Play Video
1
Contingency Table Chi-Square Test
Contingency Table Chi-Square Test
::2010/11/11::
Play Video
2
contingency table intro
contingency table intro
::2011/10/02::
Play Video
3
6. Probabilities Contingency Table
6. Probabilities Contingency Table
::2010/08/20::
Play Video
4
Probability intro to contingency tables lesson
Probability intro to contingency tables lesson
::2009/10/21::
Play Video
5
Contingency Tables
Contingency Tables
::2013/04/03::
Play Video
6
Making a contingency table using Pivot Table in Excel 2010
Making a contingency table using Pivot Table in Excel 2010
::2013/09/27::
Play Video
7
INDEPENDENT OR ASSOCIATION? Reading a CONTINGENCY TABLE
INDEPENDENT OR ASSOCIATION? Reading a CONTINGENCY TABLE
::2011/10/02::
Play Video
8
DuPage Statistics: Chi-Square Test for Contingency Tables
DuPage Statistics: Chi-Square Test for Contingency Tables
::2011/05/19::
Play Video
9
Calculate Contingency Table and Expected Values for Chi-squared Test with Excel
Calculate Contingency Table and Expected Values for Chi-squared Test with Excel
::2013/11/17::
Play Video
10
2 by 2 Contingency Table Analysis (Pearson Chi-Square) - SPSS (part 1)
2 by 2 Contingency Table Analysis (Pearson Chi-Square) - SPSS (part 1)
::2011/09/20::
Play Video
11
Contingency Tables and Joint Probability Tables
Contingency Tables and Joint Probability Tables
::2012/10/02::
Play Video
12
Elementary Statistics: Contingency Tables and Association
Elementary Statistics: Contingency Tables and Association
::2012/09/23::
Play Video
13
Chi-sq. in Excel, Pt. 1: Making the contingency table
Chi-sq. in Excel, Pt. 1: Making the contingency table
::2010/10/22::
Play Video
14
2 by 1 Contingency Table Analysis - SPSS (Pearson Chi-Square)
2 by 1 Contingency Table Analysis - SPSS (Pearson Chi-Square)
::2011/09/19::
Play Video
15
Contingency (2 Way) Tables - Business Statistics Tips
Contingency (2 Way) Tables - Business Statistics Tips
::2012/05/17::
Play Video
16
contingency tables
contingency tables
::2008/10/08::
Play Video
17
Making a Contingency (Crosstabs) table in Excel 2007 PC.mp4
Making a Contingency (Crosstabs) table in Excel 2007 PC.mp4
::2012/02/16::
Play Video
18
proportions (4) contingency tables how to analyse them in SPSS, r commander and R
proportions (4) contingency tables how to analyse them in SPSS, r commander and R
::2011/01/29::
Play Video
19
Chapter 04: Probability: Contingency table: conditional probability (1/3)
Chapter 04: Probability: Contingency table: conditional probability (1/3)
::2010/02/12::
Play Video
20
Intro to Probability : Contingency Tables
Intro to Probability : Contingency Tables
::2013/08/30::
Play Video
21
ISTA 100: Reviewing Contingency Tables Pt1
ISTA 100: Reviewing Contingency Tables Pt1
::2011/11/30::
Play Video
22
Minitab Contingency tables and computing probabilities
Minitab Contingency tables and computing probabilities
::2012/09/13::
Play Video
23
Contingency Tables on the Ti83 Calculator
Contingency Tables on the Ti83 Calculator
::2012/12/02::
Play Video
24
JMP (video 3/8) - Contingency Tables
JMP (video 3/8) - Contingency Tables
::2010/10/05::
Play Video
25
STATA Tutorials: Two- and Three-way Contingency Tables
STATA Tutorials: Two- and Three-way Contingency Tables
::2012/07/02::
Play Video
26
Hypothesis Testing - S3 Contingency Tables
Hypothesis Testing - S3 Contingency Tables
::2013/07/08::
Play Video
27
C 011 Calculating relative frequencies from a contingency table
C 011 Calculating relative frequencies from a contingency table
::2013/01/11::
Play Video
28
Making a contingency table in StatCrunch
Making a contingency table in StatCrunch
::2012/08/29::
Play Video
29
4 3 2 Contingency Tables and Conditional Probability
4 3 2 Contingency Tables and Conditional Probability
::2012/08/07::
Play Video
30
Chi Square: Contingency Tables
Chi Square: Contingency Tables
::2012/11/22::
Play Video
31
Test of Independence (Contingency Tables)
Test of Independence (Contingency Tables)
::2013/11/10::
Play Video
32
Contingency Tables and Probabilities
Contingency Tables and Probabilities
::2012/02/13::
Play Video
33
Contingency Table - Total Percentage
Contingency Table - Total Percentage
::2012/07/06::
Play Video
34
Calculating relative Frequencies in a contingency table.mp4
Calculating relative Frequencies in a contingency table.mp4
::2010/07/28::
Play Video
35
contingency table
contingency table
::2013/04/02::
Play Video
36
Contingency table.mp4
Contingency table.mp4
::2013/05/11::
Play Video
37
Calculating Odds & Odds Ratios for Contingency Tables (Crosstabulation)
Calculating Odds & Odds Ratios for Contingency Tables (Crosstabulation)
::2013/08/08::
Play Video
38
Contingency tables percentages
Contingency tables percentages
::2013/08/05::
Play Video
39
Use Chi-Square (X^2) Test for Contingency Table. TI 84. Stats 160 Final Review 34A
Use Chi-Square (X^2) Test for Contingency Table. TI 84. Stats 160 Final Review 34A
::2012/12/14::
Play Video
40
6A. Contingency Tables (Crosstabulations) - Dr. A.G. Picciano
6A. Contingency Tables (Crosstabulations) - Dr. A.G. Picciano
::2007/01/17::
Play Video
41
How to create a contingency table in XLSTAT?
How to create a contingency table in XLSTAT?
::2010/11/30::
Play Video
42
4 2 3 Two Way Tables   Contingency Tables
4 2 3 Two Way Tables Contingency Tables
::2013/04/06::
Play Video
43
Section 11.3 - Contingency Tables
Section 11.3 - Contingency Tables
::2013/04/11::
Play Video
44
Crosstabulation Tables in StatCrunch
Crosstabulation Tables in StatCrunch
::2012/03/31::
Play Video
45
ISTA 100: Reviewing Contingency Tables Pt3
ISTA 100: Reviewing Contingency Tables Pt3
::2011/12/02::
Play Video
46
Summary Statistics in R: Mean, Standard Deviation, Frequencies, etc (R Tutorial 2.7)
Summary Statistics in R: Mean, Standard Deviation, Frequencies, etc (R Tutorial 2.7)
::2013/08/10::
Play Video
47
Chapter 04: Probability: Contingency table, conditional probability (3/3)
Chapter 04: Probability: Contingency table, conditional probability (3/3)
::2010/02/12::
Play Video
48
JMP/Contingency table
JMP/Contingency table
::2012/03/01::
Play Video
49
calculating chi square from a contingency table
calculating chi square from a contingency table
::2013/03/14::
Play Video
50
Mosaic Plots and Contingency Tables
Mosaic Plots and Contingency Tables
::2014/01/06::
NEXT >>
RESULTS [51 .. 101]
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

In statistics, a contingency table (also referred to as cross tabulation or cross tab) is a type of table in a matrix format that displays the (multivariate) frequency distribution of the variables. The term contingency table was first used by Karl Pearson in "On the Theory of Contingency and Its Relation to Association and Normal Correlation",[1] part of the Drapers' Company Research Memoirs Biometric Series I published in 1904.

A crucial problem of multivariate statistics is finding (direct-)dependence structure underlying the variables contained in high-dimensional contingency tables. If some of the conditional independences are revealed, then even the storage of the data can be done in a smarter way (see Lauritzen (2002)). In order to do this one can use information theory concepts, which gain the information only from the distribution of probability, which can be expressed easily from the contingency table by the relative frequencies.

Example[edit]

Suppose that we have two variables, sex (male or female) and handedness (right- or left-handed). Further suppose that 100 individuals are randomly sampled from a very large population as part of a study of sex differences in handedness. A contingency table can be created to display the numbers of individuals who are male and right-handed, male and left-handed, female and right-handed, and female and left-handed. Such a contingency table is shown below.

Right-handed Left-handed Total
Males 43 9 52
Females 44 4 48
Totals 87 13 100

The numbers of the males, females, and right- and left-handed individuals are called marginal totals. The grand total, i.e., the total number of individuals represented in the contingency table, is the number in the bottom right corner.

The table allows us to see at a glance that the proportion of men who are right-handed is about the same as the proportion of women who are right-handed although the proportions are not identical. The significance of the difference between the two proportions can be assessed with a variety of statistical tests including Pearson's chi-squared test, the G-test, Fisher's exact test, and Barnard's test, provided the entries in the table represent individuals randomly sampled from the population about which we want to draw a conclusion. If the proportions of individuals in the different columns vary significantly between rows (or vice versa), we say that there is a contingency between the two variables. In other words, the two variables are not independent. If there is no contingency, we say that the two variables are independent.

The example above is the simplest kind of contingency table, a table in which each variable has only two levels; this is called a 2 x 2 contingency table. In principle, any number of rows and columns may be used. There may also be more than two variables, but higher order contingency tables are difficult to represent on paper. The relation between ordinal variables, or between ordinal and categorical variables, may also be represented in contingency tables, although such a practice is rare.

Measures of association[edit]

The degree of association between the two variables can be assessed by a number of coefficients: the simplest is the phi coefficient defined by

\phi=\sqrt{\frac{\chi^2}{N}},

where χ2 is derived from Pearson's chi-squared test, and N is the grand total of observations. φ varies from 0 (corresponding to no association between the variables) to 1 or -1 (complete association or complete inverse association). This coefficient can only be calculated for frequency data represented in 2 x 2 tables. φ can reach a minimum value -1.00 and a maximum value of 1.00 only when every marginal proportion is equal to .50 (and two diagonal cells are empty). Otherwise, the phi coefficient cannot reach those minimal and maximal values.[2]

Alternatives include the tetrachoric correlation coefficient (also only applicable to 2 × 2 tables), the contingency coefficient C, and Cramér's V.

C suffers from the disadvantage that it does not reach a maximum of 1 or the minimum of -1; the highest it can reach in a 2 x 2 table is .707; the maximum it can reach in a 4 × 4 table is 0.870. It can reach values closer to 1 in contingency tables with more categories. It should, therefore, not be used to compare associations among tables with different numbers of categories.[3] Moreover, it does not apply to asymmetrical tables (those where the numbers of row and columns are not equal).

The formulae for the C and V coefficients are:

C=\sqrt{\frac{\chi^2}{N+\chi^2}} and
V=\sqrt{\frac{\chi^2}{N(k-1)}},

k being the number of rows or the number of columns, whichever is less.

C can be adjusted so it reaches a maximum of 1 when there is complete association in a table of any number of rows and columns by dividing C by \sqrt{\frac{k-1}{k}} (recall that C only applies to tables in which the number of rows is equal to the number of columns and therefore equal to k).

The tetrachoric correlation coefficient assumes that the variable underlying each dichotomous measure is normally distributed.[4] The tetrachoric correlation coefficient provides "a convenient measure of [the Pearson product-moment] correlation when graduated measurements have been reduced to two categories."[5] The tetrachoric correlation should not be confused with the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient computed by assigning, say, values 0 and 1 to represent the two levels of each variable (which is mathematically equivalent to the phi coefficient). An extension of the tetrachoric correlation to tables involving variables with more than two levels is the polychoric correlation coefficient.

The Lambda coefficient is a measure of the strength of association of the cross tabulations when the variables are measured at the nominal level. Values range from 0 (no association) to 1 (the theoretical maximum possible association). Asymmetric lambda measures the percentage improvement in predicting the dependent variable. Symmetric lambda measures the percentage improvement when prediction is done in both directions.

The uncertainty coefficient is another measure for variables at the nominal level.

The values range from -1 (100% negative association, or perfect inversion) to +1 (100% positive association, or perfect agreement). A value of zero indicates the absence of association.

See also[edit]

  • The pivot operation in spreadsheet software can be used to generate a contingency table from sampling data.
  • TPL Tables is a tool for generating and printing cross tabs.
  • The iterative proportional fitting procedure essentially manipulates contingency tables to match altered joint distributions or marginal sums.
  • The multivariate statistics in special multivariate discrete probability distributions. Some procedures used in this context can be used in dealing with contingency tables.

References[edit]

  1. ^ http://ia600408.us.archive.org/18/items/cu31924003064833/cu31924003064833.pdf
  2. ^ Ferguson, G. A. (1966). Statistical analysis in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  3. ^ Smith, S. C., & Albaum, G. S. (2004) Fundamentals of marketing research. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA. p. 631
  4. ^ Ferguson.
  5. ^ Ferguson, p. 244

External links[edit]

Wikipedia content is licensed under the GFDL License

Mashpedia enables any individual or company to promote their own Youtube-hosted videos or Youtube Channels, offering a simple and effective plan to get them in front of our engaged audience.

Want to learn more? Please contact us at: hello@mashpedia.com

Powered by YouTube
LEGAL
  • Mashpedia © 2014