Share
VIDEOS 1 TO 50
Heart of Atlanta v. United States
Heart of Atlanta v. United States
Published: 2016/04/28
Channel: Jalen Gifford
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States AP Poli Sci Project
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States AP Poli Sci Project
Published: 2014/11/13
Channel: Ben Portnoy
Heart of Atlanta Motel V. US court case project
Heart of Atlanta Motel V. US court case project
Published: 2016/03/17
Channel: Melissa Long
Heart of Alanta motel vs. United States
Heart of Alanta motel vs. United States
Published: 2012/11/19
Channel: Destinee Carpenter
Heart of Atlanta Motel vs the United States from CSPAN5
Heart of Atlanta Motel vs the United States from CSPAN5
Published: 2011/03/06
Channel: Ryan O'Neill
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964)
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964)
Published: 2017/03/31
Channel: Julie Sin
Supreme Court Case: Heart of Atlanta Motel v. US
Supreme Court Case: Heart of Atlanta Motel v. US
Published: 2013/09/30
Channel: Cody Pham
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (Mr.Rexford)
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (Mr.Rexford)
Published: 2015/12/07
Channel: Sidney Ortega
Heart of Atlanta Motel vs. United States
Heart of Atlanta Motel vs. United States
Published: 2016/05/24
Channel: Emilie, Charlotte, Sydney Debbie
Heart of Atlanta Motel VS US
Heart of Atlanta Motel VS US
Published: 2015/11/02
Channel: Jenna Duncan
Heart of Atlanta Motel V. US court case
Heart of Atlanta Motel V. US court case
Published: 2017/05/24
Channel: Pratik Lama
Heart of Atlanta Motel v  United States Case Brief Court Case Briefs
Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States Case Brief Court Case Briefs
Published: 2016/11/06
Channel: Jade Scaddan
Heart of Atlanta Motel Vs. United States
Heart of Atlanta Motel Vs. United States
Published: 2017/03/22
Channel: Ximena Martinez Gavino
Heart of Atlanta v US
Heart of Atlanta v US
Published: 2016/07/14
Channel: Josh Peterson
Heart of Atlanta Motel Vs. United States
Heart of Atlanta Motel Vs. United States
Published: 2017/03/21
Channel: Ximena Martinez Gavino
heart of atlanta hotel vs us
heart of atlanta hotel vs us
Published: 2011/05/24
Channel: justjordan28201996
Heart of Atlanta Motel court case
Heart of Atlanta Motel court case
Published: 2012/03/19
Channel: Abbi Pope
15 Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
15 Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States
Published: 2015/01/17
Channel: GOVT 2305, American National Government
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States
Published: 2016/05/26
Channel: Aj Larson
Heart of Atlanta motel vs united states
Heart of Atlanta motel vs united states
Published: 2015/10/29
Channel: Celina The Fish
Heart of Atlanta v US Court Case
Heart of Atlanta v US Court Case
Published: 2016/10/21
Channel: lknswim
The United States Vs. Lopez (1995)
The United States Vs. Lopez (1995)
Published: 2013/12/13
Channel: Cristian C
Heart of Atlanta Finished
Heart of Atlanta Finished
Published: 2017/03/01
Channel: Will Ritter
The Heart of Atlanta Motel vs. U.S. case
The Heart of Atlanta Motel vs. U.S. case
Published: 2016/10/20
Channel: Mikey Bushu
CSPAN5: HEART OF ATLANTA MOTEL
CSPAN5: HEART OF ATLANTA MOTEL
Published: 2011/03/14
Channel: Maggie Stroud
The Heart of Atlanta Motel v. The United States
The Heart of Atlanta Motel v. The United States
Published: 2016/12/12
Channel: kiara stultz
Heart of Atlanta Motel
Heart of Atlanta Motel
Published: 2009/04/09
Channel: Ben Hunter
heart of atlanta
heart of atlanta
Published: 2011/11/02
Channel: CrazyBlackLadymcg
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. The United States
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. The United States
Published: 2016/05/24
Channel: Emilie, Charlotte, Sydney Debbie
Heart of Atlanta v USA
Heart of Atlanta v USA
Published: 2012/09/30
Channel: bhsteacherap
The heart of Atlanta
The heart of Atlanta
Published: 2007/08/16
Channel: Julie Odegard
Dr Bipin Adhikari - Constitutional Law: Printz v United States 2003
Dr Bipin Adhikari - Constitutional Law: Printz v United States 2003
Published: 2015/04/15
Channel: Constitutional Lawyers Nepal
Taylor v. United States: Oral Argument - February 23, 2016
Taylor v. United States: Oral Argument - February 23, 2016
Published: 2016/03/25
Channel: PuppyJusticeAutomated
Heart Atlanta Motel v US
Heart Atlanta Motel v US
Published: 2014/10/28
Channel: Melissa Padgett
Heart of Atlanta Interview
Heart of Atlanta Interview
Published: 2011/05/08
Channel: franklazaro
Heart of Atlanta Part 1
Heart of Atlanta Part 1
Published: 2007/02/05
Channel: Rachael Elliott
OneHundredfor100 on "Heart of Atlanta"
OneHundredfor100 on "Heart of Atlanta"
Published: 2012/02/08
Channel: MonicaTookesArt
Heart of Atlanta Motel
Heart of Atlanta Motel
Published: 2016/12/07
Channel: murrayca0408
Bad Frog Brewery, Inc. vs. New Your State Liquor Authority
Bad Frog Brewery, Inc. vs. New Your State Liquor Authority
Published: 2016/12/12
Channel: Parth Patel
United States v  Lopez | quimbee.com
United States v Lopez | quimbee.com
Published: 2017/09/15
Channel: Quimbee
AP GOV Heart of Atlanta v US
AP GOV Heart of Atlanta v US
Published: 2016/11/01
Channel: Jason M.
The Court Case
The Court Case
Published: 2016/03/07
Channel: Noah Wood
Court Case News - Episode 1: Aaron Vs Cooper
Court Case News - Episode 1: Aaron Vs Cooper
Published: 2016/03/31
Channel: Tahseen Khan
EliseAlchevskyCivilRightsCases
EliseAlchevskyCivilRightsCases
Published: 2014/11/17
Channel: David McAllister
Heart of Atlanta case
Heart of Atlanta case
Published: 2016/03/20
Channel: RobbyAmoruso
United States v.  Comstock | quimbee.com
United States v. Comstock | quimbee.com
Published: 2017/08/07
Channel: Quimbee
AP Gov: 14th Amendment, Civil Rights for African-Americans - Civil Rights - Part 4
AP Gov: 14th Amendment, Civil Rights for African-Americans - Civil Rights - Part 4
Published: 2016/09/05
Channel: Kelsey Falkowski
Heart of Atlanta Part 2
Heart of Atlanta Part 2
Published: 2007/02/05
Channel: Rachael Elliott
Loft in the Heart of Atlanta
Loft in the Heart of Atlanta
Published: 2013/12/28
Channel: Rhonda Morgan
Fivepoint Heart Of Atlanta Performance In Grand Rapids, MI.
Fivepoint Heart Of Atlanta Performance In Grand Rapids, MI.
Published: 2013/02/02
Channel: Adam the Great X
NEXT
GO TO RESULTS [51 .. 100]

WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Argued October 5, 1964
Decided December 14, 1964
Full case name Heart of Atlanta Motel, Incorporated v. United States, et al.
Citations 379 U.S. 241 (more)
85 S. Ct. 348; 13 L. Ed. 2d 258; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 2187; 1 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P9712
Prior history Judgment for defendant, 231 F.Supp. 393 (N.D. Ga. 1964). Appeal from the United States Court of the Northern District of Georgia
Subsequent history None
Holding
Congress did not unconstitutionally exceed its powers under the Commerce Clause by enacting Title II of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibited racial discrimination in public accommodations. Northern District of Georgia affirmed.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
Tom C. Clark · John M. Harlan II
William J. Brennan, Jr. · Potter Stewart
Byron White · Arthur Goldberg
Case opinions
Majority Clark, joined by Warren, Douglas, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White, Goldberg
Concurrence Black
Concurrence Douglas
Concurrence Goldberg
Laws applied
U.S. Const. art. I
Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Heart of Atlanta Motel Inc. v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964),[1][2] was a landmark United States Supreme Court case holding that the U.S. Congress could use the power granted to it by the Constitution's Commerce Clause to force private businesses to abide by the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Background[edit]

This important case represented an immediate challenge to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the landmark piece of civil rights legislation which represented the first comprehensive act by Congress on civil rights and race relations since the Civil Rights Act of 1875. For much of the 100 years preceding 1964, race relations in the United States had been dominated by segregation, a system of racial separation which, while in name provided for "separate but equal" treatment of both white and black Americans, in truth perpetuated inferior accommodation, services, and treatment for black Americans.

During the mid-20th century, partly as a result of cases such as Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932); Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649 (1944); Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948); Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950); McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950); NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449 (1958); Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454 (1960); and, most notably, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), public opinion began to turn against segregation. Despite the outcomes of these cases, segregation remained in full effect into the 1960s in parts of the southern United States, where the Heart of Atlanta Motel was located.

The Case[edit]

The Heart of Atlanta Motel was a large, 216-room motel in Atlanta, Georgia. In direct violation of the terms of the Civil Rights Act of 1964—an act which banned racial discrimination in public places, largely based on Congress' control of interstate commerce—the motel refused to rent rooms to black patrons. The owner, Moreton Rolleston, filed suit in federal court, arguing that the requirements of the act exceeded the authority granted to Congress over interstate commerce. In addition, Rolleston maintained that the act violated his Fifth Amendment rights to choose customers and operate his business as he wished and resulted in unjust deprivation of his property without due process of law and just compensation. Finally, he contended that Congress had placed him in a position of involuntary servitude by forcing him to rent available rooms to blacks, thereby violating his Thirteenth Amendment rights.

In response, the United States countered that the restrictions requiring adequate accommodation for black Americans were unquestionably related to interstate travel, and that Congress, under the Constitution's Commerce Clause, certainly had the power to address such a matter in law. It further argued that the Fifth Amendment does not forbid reasonable regulation of interstate commerce, and that such incidental damage did not constitute the "taking" of property without just compensation or due process of law. Lastly, it asserted that the Thirteenth Amendment applies primarily to slavery and the removal of widespread disabilities associated with it; as such, the amendment undoubtedly would not place issues of racial discrimination in public accommodations beyond the reach of federal and state law.

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ruled in favor of the United States and issued a permanent injunction requiring the Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. to refrain from using racial discrimination when providing services or goods to guests or the general public on its premises. This case was combined with the case of the future Governor of Georgia Lester Maddox concerning his Pickrick restaurant and his case to refuse to serve blacks.[3]

Decision[edit]

The opinion of the court, announced on December 14, 1964, was delivered by Justice Tom C. Clark, with concurring opinions by Justice Arthur Goldberg, Justice Hugo Black, and Justice William O. Douglas.

The U.S. Supreme Court held that Congress acted well within its authority under the Commerce Clause in passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, thereby upholding the act's Title II in question. While it might have been possible for Congress to pursue other methods for abolishing racial discrimination, the way in which Congress did so, according to the Court, was perfectly valid. It found no merit in the arguments pursuant to the Thirteenth Amendment, finding it difficult to conceive that such an amendment might be applicable in restraining civil rights legislation. Having observed that 75% of the Heart of Atlanta Motel's clientele came from out-of-state, and that it was strategically located near Interstates 75 and 85 as well as two major Georgia highways, the Court found that the business clearly affected interstate commerce. Accordingly, it upheld the permanent injunction issued by the district court and required the Heart of Atlanta Motel to receive business from clientele of all ethnicities.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Text of Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964) is available from:  Findlaw  Justia 
  2. ^ ATLANTA MOTEL v. UNITED STATES, 379 U.S. 241 (1964), APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 515. Decided December 14, 1964., retrieved September 5, 2011
  3. ^ Heart of Atlanta/Pickrick trial. Civil Rights Digital Library. Retrieved 2014-05-23

External links[edit]

Disclaimer

None of the audio/visual content is hosted on this site. All media is embedded from other sites such as GoogleVideo, Wikipedia, YouTube etc. Therefore, this site has no control over the copyright issues of the streaming media.

All issues concerning copyright violations should be aimed at the sites hosting the material. This site does not host any of the streaming media and the owner has not uploaded any of the material to the video hosting servers. Anyone can find the same content on Google Video or YouTube by themselves.

The owner of this site cannot know which documentaries are in public domain, which has been uploaded to e.g. YouTube by the owner and which has been uploaded without permission. The copyright owner must contact the source if he wants his material off the Internet completely.

Powered by YouTube
Wikipedia content is licensed under the GFDL and (CC) license