Share

WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Natural semantic metalanguage (NSM) is a linguistic theory based on the conception of Polish professor Andrzej Bogusławski. The theory was formally developed by Anna Wierzbicka at Warsaw University and later at the Australian National University in the early 1970s,[1] and Cliff Goddard at Australia's Griffith University.[2]

Approach[edit]

The Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) theory attempts to reduce the semantics of all lexicons down to a restricted set of semantic primitives, or primes. Primes are universal in that they have the same translation in every language, and they are primitive in that they cannot be defined using other words. Primes are ordered together to form explications, which are descriptions of semantic representations consisting solely of primes.[1]

Research in the NSM approach deals extensively with language and cognition, and language and culture. Key areas of research include lexical semantics, grammatical semantics, phraseology and pragmatics, as well as cross-cultural communication.

Languages studied in the NSM-framework include English, Russian, Polish, French, Spanish, Italian, Swedish, Danish, Finnish, Malay, Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Ewe, Wolof, East Cree, Koromu, and a number of creole languages including Trinidadian creole, Bislama and Tok Pisin.

Apart from the originators Anna Wierzbicka and Cliff Goddard, several other scholars have participated to NSM semantics, most notably Bert Peeters, Zhengdao Ye, Felix Ameka, Jean Harkins, Marie-Odile Junker, Anna Gladkova, Jock Wong, Carsten Levisen, Helen Bromhead, Adrian Tien, Carol Priestley, Yuko Asano-Cavanagh and Gian Marco Farese.

Semantic primes[edit]

Semantic primes (also known as semantic primitives) are concepts that are universal and primitive. Universal indicates that they can be translated literally into any known language and retain their semantic representation. They are primitive as they are proposed to be the most simple linguistic concepts and are unable to be defined using simpler terms [1].

Proponents of the NSM theory argue that every language shares a core vocabulary of concepts. In 1994 and 2002, Goddard and Wierzbicka studied languages across the globe and found strong evidence supporting this argument[1].

Wierzbicka's 1972 study[3] proposed 14 semantic primes. That number was expanded to 60 in 2002 by Wierzbicka and Goddard, and the current agreed-upon number is 65 [4][5].

Each language's translations of the semantic primes are called exponents. Below is a list of English exponents, or the English translation of the semantic primes. It is important to note that some of the exponents in the following list are polysemous and can be associated with meanings in English (and other languages) that are not shared. However, when used as an exponent in the Natural semantic metalanguage, it is only the prime concept which is identified as universal.

The following is a list of English exponents of semantic primes adapted from Levisen and Waters (eds.) 2017[6].

Category Primes
Substantives I, YOU, SOMEONE, PEOPLE, SOMETHING/THING, BODY
Relational Substantives KIND, PART
Determiners THIS, THE SAME, OTHER~ELSE~ANOTHER
Quantifiers ONE, TWO, SOME, ALL, MUCH/MANY, LITTLE/FEW
Evaluators GOOD, BAD
Descriptors BIG, SMALL
Mental predicates THINK, KNOW, WANT, DON'T WANT, FEEL, SEE, HEAR
Speech SAY, WORDS, TRUE
Actions, Events, Movement DO, HAPPEN, MOVE
Existence, Possession BE (SOMEWHERE), THERE IS, BE (SOMEONE/SOMETHING), (IS) MINE
Life and Death LIVE, DIE
Time WHEN/TIME, NOW, BEFORE, AFTER, A LONG TIME, A SHORT TIME, FOR SOME TIME, MOMENT
Space WHERE/PLACE, HERE, ABOVE, BELOW, FAR, NEAR, SIDE, INSIDE, TOUCH (CONTACT)
Logical Concepts NOT, MAYBE, CAN, BECAUSE, IF
Intensifier, Augmentor VERY, MORE
Similarity LIKE/AS/WAY

NSM Syntax[edit]

NSM primes can be combined in a limited set of syntactic frames that are also universal [7]. These valency options specify the specific types of grammatical functions that can be combined with the primes. While these combinations can be realized differently in other languages, it is believed that the meanings expressed by these syntactic combinations are universal.

Example of valency frames for SAY (from Semantic Analysis [7] )

someone said something→[minimal frame]

someone said: '––'→[direct speech]

someone said something to someone→[plus 'addressee']

someone said something about something/someone→[plus 'locutionary topic']

Explications[edit]

A semantic analysis in the NSM approach results in a reductive paraphrase called an explication that captures the meaning of the concept explicated [7]. An ideal explication can be substituted for the original expression in context without change of meaning.

E.g., Someone X killed someone Y:
someone X did something to someone else Y
because of this, something happened to Y at the same time
because of this, something happened to Y's body
because of this, after this Y was not living anymore[8]

Semantic Molecules[edit]

Semantic molecules are intermediary words used in explications and cultural scripts. While not semantic primes, they can be defined exclusively using primes. Semantic molecules can be determined as words that are necessary to build upon to explicate other words [6]. These molecules are marked by the notation [m] in explications and cultural scripts. Some molecules are proposed to be universal or near-universal, while others are culture or area specific[9].

Examples of proposed universal molecules:

hands, mouth, eyes, head, ears, nose, face, teeth, fingers, breast, skin, bones, blood Body parts
long, round, flat, thin, hard, soft, sharp, smooth, heavy Physical
children, men, women, be born, mother, father, wife, husband Biosocial

Minimal English[edit]

Minimal English is a new derivative of the Natural semantic metalanguage research, with the first major publication in 2018 [10]. It is a reduced form of English designed for non-specialists to use when requiring clarity of expression or easily translatable materials[11]. Minimal English uses an expanded set of vocabulary to the semantic primes. It includes the proposed universal and near-universal molecules, as well as non-universal words which can assist in clarity [12]. Minimal English differs from other simple Englishes (such as Basic English) as it has been specifically designed for maximal cross-translatability.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d Murphy, M. Lynne (2010). Lexical Meaning. Cambridge. pp. 69–73. ISBN 978-0521677646. 
  2. ^ Goddard, Cliff; Wierzbicka, Anna, eds. (2002). Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings. John Benjamins. ISBN 9781588112644. 
  3. ^ Wierzbicka, Anna (1972). Semantic Primitives. Athenäum. 
  4. ^ Ye, Zhengdao, ed. (2017). The Semantics of Nouns. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198736721. 
  5. ^ Goddard, Cliff; Wierzbicka, Anna (2014). Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics across Domains, Languages and Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199668434. 
  6. ^ a b Levisen, Carsten; Waters, Sophia, eds. (2017). Cultural Keywords in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. ISBN 9789027256829. 
  7. ^ a b c Goddard, Cliff (2011). Semantic Analysis. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199560288. 
  8. ^ Goddard, Cliff. "The Natural Semantic Metalanguage Approach" (PDF). Retrieved 27 May 2013. 
  9. ^ Goddard, Cliff. "Semantic Molecules". NSM Homepage. Retrieved 2 February 2018. 
  10. ^ Goddard, Cliff, ed. (2018). Minimal English for a Global World. Palgrave Macmillan. 
  11. ^ Goddard, Cliff; Wierzbicka, Anna. "Global English, Minimal English position papers" (PDF). Global English, Minimal English: Towards better intercultural communication. Retrieved 2 February 2018. 
  12. ^ Goddard, Cliff. "Minimal English". NSM Homepage. Retrieved 2 February 2018. 
  13. ^ Semantic Decomposition and Marker Passing in an Artificial Representation of Meaning, Doctoral Thesis of Johannes Fähndrich at the Technischen Universität Berlin 2018 https://d-nb.info/1162540680/34

Sources[edit]

  • Goddard, Cliff. 1998. Semantic Analysis: A practical introduction. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
  • Goddard, Cliff (ed.) 2006. Ethnopragmatics – Understanding discourse in cultural context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Goddard, Cliff (ed.) 2008. Cross-Linguistic Semantics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Goddard, Cliff and Wierzbicka, Anna (eds.). 1994. Semantic and Lexical Universals – Theory and Empirical Findings. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Goddard, Cliff and Wierzbicka, Anna (eds.). 2002. Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings (2 volumes). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Harkins, Jean & Anna Wierzbicka. 2001. Emotions in Crosslinguistic Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Peeters, Bert (ed.) 2006. Semantic Primes and Universal Grammar: Empirical evidence from the Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1972. Semantic Primitives. Frankfurt: Athenäum.
  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1992. Semantics, Culture, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1997. Understanding Cultures Through Their Key Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1999. Emotions Across Languages and Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 2003 (1991). Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. 2nd edition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 2006. English: Meaning and culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

External links[edit]

Disclaimer

None of the audio/visual content is hosted on this site. All media is embedded from other sites such as GoogleVideo, Wikipedia, YouTube etc. Therefore, this site has no control over the copyright issues of the streaming media.

All issues concerning copyright violations should be aimed at the sites hosting the material. This site does not host any of the streaming media and the owner has not uploaded any of the material to the video hosting servers. Anyone can find the same content on Google Video or YouTube by themselves.

The owner of this site cannot know which documentaries are in public domain, which has been uploaded to e.g. YouTube by the owner and which has been uploaded without permission. The copyright owner must contact the source if he wants his material off the Internet completely.

Powered by YouTube
Wikipedia content is licensed under the GFDL and (CC) license