Share
VIDEOS 1 TO 50
Patents, Prizes, and Subsidies
Patents, Prizes, and Subsidies
Published: 2016/05/17
Channel: Marginal Revolution University
Prizes as an alternative to patents
Prizes as an alternative to patents
Published: 2017/07/15
Channel: Search Engine
Lecture 02 - Macroeconomics and Policy Alternatives
Lecture 02 - Macroeconomics and Policy Alternatives
Published: 2015/01/06
Channel: Patent Law at PennLaw
Win100 Gift Card Prize System
Win100 Gift Card Prize System
Published: 2016/08/28
Channel: Tarance Gaines
Current Issues in Patent Law and Policy
Current Issues in Patent Law and Policy
Published: 2015/04/17
Channel: University of Chicago Law School
Redstone Contraption #2 Prize System
Redstone Contraption #2 Prize System
Published: 2013/05/29
Channel: Maiko-Chan
The Costs and Benefits of Monopoly
The Costs and Benefits of Monopoly
Published: 2015/03/18
Channel: Marginal Revolution University
Update and Points to Prize System watch to find out more...
Update and Points to Prize System watch to find out more...
Published: 2012/03/14
Channel: kaystarhype
7 Surprising Uses for Poop
7 Surprising Uses for Poop
Published: 2015/01/13
Channel: Good Mythical Morning
10 Best Economics Textbooks 2017
10 Best Economics Textbooks 2017
Published: 2017/08/01
Channel: Ezvid Wiki
The Investment 2017
The Investment 2017
Published: 2017/05/05
Channel: wpsu
'Lots of important things are funny'
Published: 2013/10/05
Channel: PBS NewsHour
Urban Legends That Won
Urban Legends That Won't Die
Published: 2015/01/12
Channel: Good Mythical Morning
EurekaFest 2017 Student Prize Presentations Opening Remarks
EurekaFest 2017 Student Prize Presentations Opening Remarks
Published: 2017/07/21
Channel: Lemelson MIT
The Innovators: Ig Nobel Prize
The Innovators: Ig Nobel Prize
Published: 2016/03/15
Channel: SciTech Now
How the Movies are Fooling Us | Jeff Dahn | TEDxHalifaxWestHigh
How the Movies are Fooling Us | Jeff Dahn | TEDxHalifaxWestHigh
Published: 2015/05/07
Channel: TEDx Talks
Rep. Shelley Berkley: Green energy subsidies aren
Rep. Shelley Berkley: Green energy subsidies aren't about government "picking winners and losers"
Published: 2012/04/11
Channel: Nevada Policy Research Institute
Kazakhstan citizen patents new version of chess
Kazakhstan citizen patents new version of chess
Published: 2017/01/18
Channel: Kazakh TV
Banana peel study wins Ig Nobel spoof awards
Banana peel study wins Ig Nobel spoof awards
Published: 2014/09/20
Channel: NTDTV
10 kW MAGNETIC MOTOR FREE ENERGY
10 kW MAGNETIC MOTOR FREE ENERGY
Published: 2016/02/08
Channel: Infinity SAV Team
Libertarian perspectives on intellectual property
Libertarian perspectives on intellectual property
Published: 2017/07/15
Channel: Search Engine
The Things You Learn on Wikipedia: The Ig Nobel Prize
The Things You Learn on Wikipedia: The Ig Nobel Prize
Published: 2015/02/25
Channel: Arthur AlbertTV
Link Is Rhett
Link Is Rhett's Grandma's New Boyfriend (Wheel of Mythicality - Ep. 33)
Published: 2014/12/06
Channel: Good Mythical Morning
Think faster focus better and remember moreRewiring our brain to stay younger...
Think faster focus better and remember moreRewiring our brain to stay younger...
Published: 2008/10/24
Channel: GoogleTechTalks
Innovation and the Administrative State
Innovation and the Administrative State
Published: 2015/04/16
Channel: University of Chicago Law School
Taxing Work
Taxing Work
Published: 2016/11/22
Channel: Marginal Revolution University
MJ Compassion & Common Sense - 04/10/15
MJ Compassion & Common Sense - 04/10/15
Published: 2015/04/10
Channel: Time4Hemp
A Cultural Commons - alternative approaches to copyright and the distribution of material
A Cultural Commons - alternative approaches to copyright and the distribution of material
Published: 2011/06/20
Channel: Artquest, London
cablecatcher  - Catches your cable before if falls off the table!
cablecatcher - Catches your cable before if falls off the table!
Published: 2016/05/09
Channel: cablecatcher
Open patent
Open patent
Published: 2017/07/15
Channel: Search Engine
Law Apps Bake Off
Law Apps Bake Off
Published: 2015/10/26
Channel: The University of Melbourne
Why We Should Fund Science
Why We Should Fund Science
Published: 2012/05/25
Channel: Connor
The K-Way MOTUS Team
The K-Way MOTUS Team
Published: 2010/06/20
Channel: progautoxp
Interview: Choosing the Next Experiment: Tradition, Innovation, and Efficiency
Interview: Choosing the Next Experiment: Tradition, Innovation, and Efficiency
Published: 2015/02/05
Channel: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford
2016 InVenture Prize Final
2016 InVenture Prize Final
Published: 2016/03/25
Channel: GPB
GOODBYE, GOODBYE
GOODBYE, GOODBYE
Published: 2015/09/07
Channel: Guido DaSquirrel
Human Spotlight
Human Spotlight
Published: 2015/07/19
Channel: bigpoppaswag
Famicom Disk System - Gaming Historian
Famicom Disk System - Gaming Historian
Published: 2016/07/14
Channel: Gaming Historian
Father John Misty - Pure Comedy [Official Music Video]
Father John Misty - Pure Comedy [Official Music Video]
Published: 2017/01/23
Channel: Father John Misty
Talks@HMS: The Science of Pain: Complexities and Therapies
Talks@HMS: The Science of Pain: Complexities and Therapies
Published: 2017/08/18
Channel: Harvard Medical School
Free software license
Free software license
Published: 2017/07/15
Channel: Search Engine
Father John Misty: Pure Comedy - SNL
Father John Misty: Pure Comedy - SNL
Published: 2017/03/05
Channel: Saturday Night Live
ALLEY NYC Startup Battles Hitlist App WINNER Gillian Morris
ALLEY NYC Startup Battles Hitlist App WINNER Gillian Morris
Published: 2013/12/23
Channel: Web Tech Television
Open Music Model
Open Music Model
Published: 2017/07/15
Channel: Search Engine
'Autonomous 'killer robots' could replace drones soon' - Nobel Peace Prize winner Jody Williams
Published: 2014/01/13
Channel: RT
ALLEY NYC Startup Battles Romany Malco
ALLEY NYC Startup Battles Romany Malco
Published: 2013/12/23
Channel: Web Tech Television
Father John Misty - "Pure Comedy" [Live In Port Chester]
Father John Misty - "Pure Comedy" [Live In Port Chester]
Published: 2017/09/15
Channel: Father John Misty
Faculty Forum Online: Daniel Anderson
Faculty Forum Online: Daniel Anderson
Published: 2017/02/02
Channel: MIT Alumni Association
Honda on Pinterest - Twitter
Honda on Pinterest - Twitter's IPA - Olympics
Published: 2012/04/18
Channel: marketingtrendsnews
Infoanarchism
Infoanarchism
Published: 2017/07/15
Channel: Search Engine
NEXT
GO TO RESULTS [51 .. 100]

WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Some authors advocating patent reform have proposed the use of prizes as an alternative to patents. Critics of the current patent system, such as Joseph E. Stiglitz, say that patents fail to provide incentives for innovations which are not commercially marketable. Stiglitz provides the idea of prizes instead of patents to be awarded in order to further advance solutions to global problems such as AIDS.

Background[edit]

Patents essentially provide a temporary monopoly on a product to the first inventor or firm which comes up with the product. Patents vary in length but are designed to last long enough for the innovator to make a return on investment. The nature of patents makes them an incentive so long as the product being invented is distributed to consumers through markets. While patented products are in the market, the producer can place any price on the product, regardless of the price of production which typically dictates prices in markets. If a product is not being distributed through markets then a patent cannot provide proper incentive for innovation. Patents do however provide gain through the restriction of information to others. Stiglitz identifies this as a problem of patents for the innovation of drugs and other products being distributed not with the purpose of making a profit, but to solve global problems.

Offering a prize as opposed to a patent, according to Stiglitz, would address the lack of incentive for problems such as disease in developing countries, and it would provide products immediately affordable instead of pending a patent expiration. Awarding prizes offers a fixed amount appropriate for reimbursing research into drugs. Today, many drug companies spend much of money earned through patents on marketing and advertising as opposed to the research for the actual drugs [1]

Stiglitz goes on to assert that until generic versions of drugs reach the shelves, which occurs after a patent expires, the costs burden consumers due to prices not being dictated by the markets.[2] These burdens are overwhelming in developing countries and Stiglitz suggests they be lowered by offering prizes instead of patents. Stiglitz discusses the idea of using foreign aid assistance funds to finance prizes as it would provide greater foreign aid than what funds are being used for currently.[3]

United States[edit]

Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont put forward legislation in the United States Senate in 2005 and 2007 under H.R. 417 and S.2210.[4] Sanders has been a longtime proponent of Stiglitz’ ideas, and favors a system of incentives for innovation in medicine and pharmaceuticals over a system of patents, which he asserts grant company monopolies on drugs and drive up pharmaceutical prices.

The Medical Innovation Prize Fund Act S1137 and S1138[edit]

The two bills proposed on May 26, 2011 by Senator Bernie Sanders would completely remove legal barriers to the manufacture and sale of generic drugs. The bills will give the government the right to set specific goals and direct research to certain areas of medicine. S1137 would apply to all prescription drugs, and S1138 is focused on HIV/AIDS medications. The bills call for both the government and private insurance companies to fund the "Medical Innovation Prize Fund". According to the S1137 bill, the innovation fund would create a fund of .55% of GDP, $80 billion of GDP based on 2010 numbers. S1138 calls for a .02% GDP fund for HIV/AIDS innovation prizes that amounts to about $3 billion a year.[5]

In a statement made at a subcommittee meeting, Senator Sanders said, "It simply blew me away — and would blow anyone’s mind away — that one drug, Atripla, costs $25,000 per year". He called this bill, “Fairly radical for the U.S. Congress.” According to estimates, proponents of the bill believe that the costs of the prizes would be offset by the introduction of generic drugs and the reduction of monopoly power in the pharmaceutical industry. Sanders believes that these bills will save private insurers, Medicaid, and other government assistance programs money.[6]

One of the goals of the bill is to "de-link research and development incentives from product prices" along with getting rid of patents and what the bill's author asserts to be monopoly power. It aims to free research and development by proposing a possible "Open Source Dividend" element. This means that a percentage of the prize money from the innovation funds would go to those persons or communities that allow access to knowledge, data, etc. to public domains and offer free access to patents.

Senator Sanders and other proponents of both bills[who?] assert that the prize funds will give incentives for manufacturers to seek innovative treatments for illnesses and diseases that are more important to society. In addition, they state that these funds will lower drugs prices, along with what they claim to be wasteful research and development costs.[5] This bill has been favored by Joseph Stiglitz.[citation needed]

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have tried such a prize fund model. In their model, all applicants for funding from the Gates foundation must waive all claims to patents. “A World Health Organization (WHO) report, called 'Research and Development to Meet health Needs in Developing Countries', backs prize funds, saying it is a financially viable model”[7]

In 2012 the two bills were referred to the committee level in the Senate. They have not been put to a vote in either the Senate or the House. In 2009-2010 only 3% of all bills proposed in the senate were enacted.[8]

Other areas for prize models over patents[edit]

US President Barack Obama has pushed for prizes innovation sponsoring 150 contests across 40 agencies in 2010.[citation needed] NASA paid out $6 million in prizes to companies since 2005 for innovation.[citation needed] Between 2000-2007 certain groups put $250 million into technologies that range from robotic arms and tuberculosis tests, according to Brian Vastag of The Washington Post.[6]

Criticism[edit]

Criticisms of prize funds focus on the impact of prizes as limited by their size, scope, and nature. Prizes large enough to replace patents as incentives to develop innovative new products require large up-front costs for taxpayers.[citation needed] According to the Global Intellectual Property Center, studies show that prizes are better at proving a concept than bringing concrete, useful technologies into existence.[9] Another criticism made by the Global Intellectual Property Center is that prizes will never be enough to reward lucky breaks that have brought about the most important innovations.[citation needed] Also, the center argues that prizes do not create incentives to drive continuous cycle of advances and improvements because prizes are finite and limited.[9]

The Global Intellectual Property Center also believes that prizes focus narrowly on certain acts or on the "next new thing", and that prizes can act as distractions from more significant innovations.[9] They also assert that prizes do not hold researchers and inventors accountable for the findings of works or creations.[9] The center argues that prizes in turn give rights to a product to a government, who then gives rights to the entire public. In the future, if there are any problems or questions with the creation, or drug, it will be impossible to determine who is responsible for the flaw.[9]

Within the pharmaceutical industry,[who?] prize theory has gotten much criticism. One of the main criticisms is that giving rewards in the form of prize money to drug companies for producing innovative drugs will not be seen for many years while the drug is tested in the market,[citation needed] and that prize funds would not reward pharmaceuticals for producing different versions of drugs; “me-too” drugs.[citation needed] These variations are seen as part of the bigger problem by Senator Sanders.[6]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Disclaimer

None of the audio/visual content is hosted on this site. All media is embedded from other sites such as GoogleVideo, Wikipedia, YouTube etc. Therefore, this site has no control over the copyright issues of the streaming media.

All issues concerning copyright violations should be aimed at the sites hosting the material. This site does not host any of the streaming media and the owner has not uploaded any of the material to the video hosting servers. Anyone can find the same content on Google Video or YouTube by themselves.

The owner of this site cannot know which documentaries are in public domain, which has been uploaded to e.g. YouTube by the owner and which has been uploaded without permission. The copyright owner must contact the source if he wants his material off the Internet completely.

Powered by YouTube
Wikipedia content is licensed under the GFDL and (CC) license