Play Video
1
Neurons or nerve cells - Structure function and types of neurons | Human Anatomy | 3D Biology
Neurons or nerve cells - Structure function and types of neurons | Human Anatomy | 3D Biology
::2013/04/27::
Play Video
2
Structure & Types of Neurons by Professor Fink
Structure & Types of Neurons by Professor Fink
::2012/07/19::
Play Video
3
The Structural Basis of Congenital Disorder of Glycosylation Type 1a
The Structural Basis of Congenital Disorder of Glycosylation Type 1a
::2013/04/22::
Play Video
4
Structural Controls: Market-Based Algorithm
Structural Controls: Market-Based Algorithm
::2011/10/26::
Play Video
5
Lambda Days - Konrad Malawski - Types of Types... in Scala
Lambda Days - Konrad Malawski - Types of Types... in Scala
::2014/04/22::
Play Video
6
Roof Truss Basics - Structural Engineering And Home Building Tips
Roof Truss Basics - Structural Engineering And Home Building Tips
::2012/11/12::
Play Video
7
Class 11-Zoology-Structural Organization in Animals-Online-NEET Lectures
Class 11-Zoology-Structural Organization in Animals-Online-NEET Lectures
::2013/04/05::
Play Video
8
Revit Structure Basics, Grids, Columns, Beams and Beam Systems
Revit Structure Basics, Grids, Columns, Beams and Beam Systems
::2011/01/24::
Play Video
9
IMS (Intelligent Seismic Monitoring Structural System)
IMS (Intelligent Seismic Monitoring Structural System)
::2013/10/07::
Play Video
10
Structure Of Neuron
Structure Of Neuron
::2010/04/30::
Play Video
11
Tunnel Type Structure Plate Cleaning Machine
Tunnel Type Structure Plate Cleaning Machine
::2012/08/10::
Play Video
12
How Nervous System Works
How Nervous System Works
::2014/01/05::
Play Video
13
Peddinghaus Automated Structural / Architectural Steel Cutting, Drilling & Coping System
Peddinghaus Automated Structural / Architectural Steel Cutting, Drilling & Coping System
::2010/08/10::
Play Video
14
Lally Lock Structural Column
Lally Lock Structural Column
::2013/03/23::
Play Video
15
Looking for Signs of Foundation Structural Problems | Tar Heel Basement Systems
Looking for Signs of Foundation Structural Problems | Tar Heel Basement Systems
::2014/03/26::
Play Video
16
What is a Shear Wall
What is a Shear Wall
::2013/03/28::
Play Video
17
Precast Structural System for Salman Bay Housing Project, Jeddah
Precast Structural System for Salman Bay Housing Project, Jeddah
::2012/02/16::
Play Video
18
Green Panel Romania - SIP (structural insulated panels)
Green Panel Romania - SIP (structural insulated panels)
::2010/05/04::
Play Video
19
Automotive solutions - NVH systems - part 2 - Structural analysis - Brüel & Kjær
Automotive solutions - NVH systems - part 2 - Structural analysis - Brüel & Kjær
::2013/03/08::
Play Video
20
Animals Cells Structure & Functions Animation Video for Kids
Animals Cells Structure & Functions Animation Video for Kids
::2013/04/22::
Play Video
21
Golden Gate Enterprises SF Bay Area Waterproof Deck Dry Rot Structural Contractor
Golden Gate Enterprises SF Bay Area Waterproof Deck Dry Rot Structural Contractor
::2013/04/19::
Play Video
22
Introduction to the Waffle-Crete Structural Precast Building System
Introduction to the Waffle-Crete Structural Precast Building System
::2010/10/21::
Play Video
23
Bonding Models and Lewis Structures: Crash Course Chemistry #24
Bonding Models and Lewis Structures: Crash Course Chemistry #24
::2013/07/30::
Play Video
24
SUPER ADVANCED UK Royal Navy Type 45 Daring class Destroyer
SUPER ADVANCED UK Royal Navy Type 45 Daring class Destroyer
::2014/02/01::
Play Video
25
Structural Geology - Lesson 6 - Joints & Veins: Regional Systems - Part 2 of 4
Structural Geology - Lesson 6 - Joints & Veins: Regional Systems - Part 2 of 4
::2011/01/12::
Play Video
26
Types of Footings Residential and Commercial Construction
Types of Footings Residential and Commercial Construction
::2012/09/05::
Play Video
27
Joint Classification
Joint Classification
::2012/05/01::
Play Video
28
Structural Design Consideration for Rigid Bus Systems in Substations
Structural Design Consideration for Rigid Bus Systems in Substations
::2011/08/12::
Play Video
29
Antibody Structure & Function
Antibody Structure & Function
::2014/01/16::
Play Video
30
NEES UCSD RC Frame with Infill El Centro 190p
NEES UCSD RC Frame with Infill El Centro 190p
::2012/08/07::
Play Video
31
Basic Structure Of A Computer System By Er Jagriti Srivastava
Basic Structure Of A Computer System By Er Jagriti Srivastava
::2013/03/16::
Play Video
32
TrimBonder: A structural adhesive bonding system for PVC trim board.  Instructions part 4
TrimBonder: A structural adhesive bonding system for PVC trim board. Instructions part 4
::2012/01/16::
Play Video
33
Paneles Estructrales Energy Efficient Structural Insulated Panels
Paneles Estructrales Energy Efficient Structural Insulated Panels
::2011/12/30::
Play Video
34
DYWIDAG Systems for Structural and Civil Engineering, Czech. Republic and Slovakia
DYWIDAG Systems for Structural and Civil Engineering, Czech. Republic and Slovakia
::2012/10/01::
Play Video
35
Structural features of bones
Structural features of bones
::2013/11/07::
Play Video
36
EDGE : Structure of NaCl (Class 11,12)
EDGE : Structure of NaCl (Class 11,12)
::2010/04/20::
Play Video
37
Strategic Management: Organizational Structure
Strategic Management: Organizational Structure
::2012/03/23::
Play Video
38
Computer aided Structural Analysis of Sweep type tillage tool:CULTIVATOR by GOPAL U. SHINDE
Computer aided Structural Analysis of Sweep type tillage tool:CULTIVATOR by GOPAL U. SHINDE
::2010/10/03::
Play Video
39
Peddinghaus Structural & architectural CNC cutting, drilling- & copying system
Peddinghaus Structural & architectural CNC cutting, drilling- & copying system
::2011/02/18::
Play Video
40
Structural Steel Connections
Structural Steel Connections
::2013/03/11::
Play Video
41
Mod-01 Lec-01 Introduction to different types of ocean structures I
Mod-01 Lec-01 Introduction to different types of ocean structures I
::2013/05/22::
Play Video
42
temate® IB (Nondestructive Testing (NDT) of large structural I-Beams)
temate® IB (Nondestructive Testing (NDT) of large structural I-Beams)
::2010/01/04::
Play Video
43
SIP - Structural Insulated Panels for any type of constructions
SIP - Structural Insulated Panels for any type of constructions
::2011/01/11::
Play Video
44
VOORTMAN  STRUCTURAL STEEL BURNING SYSTEMS
VOORTMAN STRUCTURAL STEEL BURNING SYSTEMS
::2009/05/22::
Play Video
45
Peddinghaus Structural & architectural CNC cutting, drilling- & copying system
Peddinghaus Structural & architectural CNC cutting, drilling- & copying system
::2011/02/17::
Play Video
46
Roof structure summary
Roof structure summary
::2012/02/19::
Play Video
47
Structure of the Earth - Inside our earth
Structure of the Earth - Inside our earth
::2013/03/19::
Play Video
48
Signs of Foundation Structural Failure | Ask the Expert | The Basement Doctor of Cincinnati
Signs of Foundation Structural Failure | Ask the Expert | The Basement Doctor of Cincinnati
::2014/01/13::
Play Video
49
Hybrid surface enhancement for structural steel / Surface enhancement for biomedical applications
Hybrid surface enhancement for structural steel / Surface enhancement for biomedical applications
::2010/04/16::
Play Video
50
Using Structural Models for Policy Evaluation II
Using Structural Models for Policy Evaluation II
::2013/12/23::
NEXT >>
RESULTS [51 .. 101]
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

A structural type system (or property-based type system) is a major class of type system, in which type compatibility and equivalence are determined by the type's actual structure or definition, and not by other characteristics such as its name or place of declaration. Structural systems are used to determine if types are equivalent and whether a type is a subtype of another. It contrasts with nominative systems, where comparisons are based on the names of the types or explicit declarations, and duck typing, in which only the part of the structure accessed at runtime is checked for compatibility.

Description[edit]

In structural typing, a given element is considered to be compatible with another if, for each feature within the second element's type, there is a corresponding and identical feature in the first element's type. Some languages may differ on the details, such as whether the features must match in name. This definition is not symmetric, and includes subtype compatibility. Two types are considered to be identical if each is compatible with the other.

As an example, OCaml uses structural typing on methods for compatibility of object types. Go uses structural typing on methods to determine compatibility of a type with an interface. C++ template functions exhibit structural typing on type arguments. Haxe uses structural typing, although classes are not structurally subtyped.

In languages which support subtype polymorphism, a similar dichotomy can be formed based on how the subtype relationship is defined. One type is a subtype of another if and only if it contains all the features of the base type (or subtypes thereof); the subtype may contain additional features (such as members not present in the base type, or stronger invariants).

There is a distinction between structural substitution for inferred and non-inferred polymorphism. Some languages, such as Haskell, do not substitute structurally in the case where an expected type is declared (i.e. not inferred), e.g. only substitute for functions that are signature-based polymorphic via type inference.[1] Then it is not possible to accidentally subtype a non-inferred type, although it may still be possible to provide an explicit conversion to a non-inferred type, which is invoked implicitly.

Structural subtyping is arguably more flexible than nominative subtyping, as it permits the creation of ad hoc types and protocols; in particular, it permits creation of a type which is a supertype of an existing type, without modifying the definition of the latter. However, this may not be desirable where the programmer wishes to create closed abstractions.

A pitfall of structural typing versus nominative typing is that two separately defined types intended for different purposes, but accidentally holding the same properties (e.g. both composed of a pair of integers), could be considered the same type by the type system, simply because they happen to have identical structure. One way this can be avoided is by creating one algebraic data type for each use.

In 1990, Cook, et al, proved that inheritance is not subtyping in structurally-typed OO languages.

Example[edit]

Objects in OCaml are structurally typed by the names and types of their methods.

Objects can be created directly ("immediate objects") without going through a nominative class. Classes only serve as functions for creating objects.

 # let x =
     object
       val mutable x = 5
       method get_x = x
       method set_x y = x <- y
     end;;
 val x : < get_x : int; set_x : int -> unit > = <obj>

Here the OCaml interactive runtime prints out the inferred type of the object for convenience. You can see that its type (< get_x : int; set_x : int -> unit >) is purely defined by its methods.[clarification needed]

Let's define another object, which has the same methods and types of methods:

 # let y =
     object
       method get_x = 2
       method set_x y = Printf.printf "%d\n" y
     end;;
 val y : < get_x : int; set_x : int -> unit > = <obj>

You can see that OCaml considers them the same type. For example, the equality operator is typed to only take two values of the same type:

 # x = y;;
 - : bool = false

So they must be the same type, or else this wouldn't even type-check. This shows that equivalence of types is structural.

One can define a function that invokes a method:

 # let set_to_10 a = a#set_x 10;;
 val set_to_10 : < set_x : int -> 'a; .. > -> 'a = <fun>

The inferred type for the first argument (< set_x : int -> 'a; .. >) is interesting. The .. means that the first argument can be any object which has a "set_x" method, which takes an int as argument.

So we can use it on object x:

 # set_to_10 x;;
 - : unit = ()

We can make another object that happens to have that method and method type; the other methods are irrelevant:

 # let z =
     object
       method blahblah = 2.5
       method set_x y = Printf.printf "%d\n" y
     end;;
 val z : < blahblah : float; set_x : int -> unit > = <obj>

The "set_to_10" function also works on it:

 # set_to_10 z;;
 10
 - : unit = ()

This shows that compatibility for things like method invocation is determined by structure.

Let us define a type synonym for objects with only a "get_x" method and no other methods:

 # type simpler_obj = < get_x : int >;;
 type simpler_obj = < get_x : int >

Our object x is not of this type; but structurally, x is of a subtype of this type, since x contains a superset of its methods. So we can coerce x to this type:

 # (x :> simpler_obj);;
 - : simpler_obj = <obj>
 # (x :> simpler_obj)#get_x;;
 - : int = 10

But not object z, because it is not a structural subtype:

 # (z :> simpler_obj);;
 This expression cannot be coerced to type simpler_obj = < get_x : int >;
 it has type < blahblah : float; set_x : int -> unit > but is here used with type
   < get_x : int; .. >
 The first object type has no method get_x

This shows that compatibility for widening coercions are structural.

References[edit]

External links[edit]

Wikipedia content is licensed under the GFDL License
Powered by YouTube
LEGAL
  • Mashpedia © 2014