VIDEOS 1 TO 50

What Makes a Sentence True or False? Predicate Logic

Published: 2015/10/07

Channel: The Ling Space

Truth Table Tutorial - Discrete Mathematics Logic

Published: 2014/03/26

Channel: Emily Jane

Value Semantics: It aint about the syntax!

Published: 2014/09/24

Channel: BoostCon

SEM121 - Propositions

Published: 2013/05/08

Channel: The Virtual Linguistics Campus

How Do We Capture the Truth of Beliefs? Type Theory

Published: 2016/12/15

Channel: The Ling Space

Modal Semantics & Metaphysics

Published: 2013/05/19

Channel: Philosophy Overdose

NLP Values Elicitation: How To Discover Your Highest Values

Published: 2016/06/05

Channel: NLP Gym

What is TRUTH CONDITION? What does TRUTH CONDITION mean? TRUTH CONDITION meaning & explanation

Published: 2016/11/15

Channel: The Audiopedia

Jacque Fresco - Looking Backward, Truth, Learning, Semantics

Published: 2010/10/07

Channel: The Venus Project

Propositional Logic: Semantics, Part 1

Published: 2015/06/04

Channel: David Agler

Ernest Sosa on Epistemology - The Nature & Value of Knowledge

Published: 2013/04/16

Channel: Philosophy Overdose

Linguistic Micro-Lectures: Propositions

Published: 2014/09/08

Channel: The Virtual Linguistics Campus

Truth Value

Published: 2012/09/28

Channel: MathMeij

Truth Tables and Logical Connectives

Published: 2014/09/22

Channel: patrickJMT

Proposition

Published: 2014/08/19

Channel: Audiopedia

Can We Define "Must"? The Semantics of Modality

Published: 2017/06/29

Channel: The Ling Space

What Is Meant By A Theory Of Semantics?

Published: 2017/09/09

Channel: Funny Question

Truth and Content - Stephen Yablo

Published: 2012/10/16

Channel: SonytoBratsoni

Propositions and Truth Values (definition)

Published: 2014/04/27

Channel: PhiPsiPi (English)

PHILOSOPHY - Language: Meaning and Language [HD]

Published: 2014/11/07

Channel: Wireless Philosophy

2.3 Semantics of Propositional Logic

Published: 2012/10/12

Channel: Daniel Junior

Simple Example Involving Truth Values

Published: 2012/11/05

Channel: lbowen11235

Propositional Logic: Semantics, Part 2

Published: 2015/06/03

Channel: David Agler

Hilary Putnam on Meaning & Externalism

Published: 2016/03/25

Channel: Philosophy Overdose

What is TRUTH-VALUE LINK? What does TRUTH-VALUE LINK mean? TRUTH-VALUE LINK meaning

Published: 2016/11/17

Channel: The Audiopedia

1.3 Formal Definition of Truth Tables

Published: 2016/05/13

Channel: Lassonde Student

Truth Table

Published: 2011/05/31

Channel: easymathk12

Semantics - The Rise and Fall of Muammar al Gaddafi

Published: 2013/10/21

Channel: Critical Productions

4.5 Intro to Truth Trees

Published: 2013/04/07

Channel: jellologic

Part 1: Symbolic Logic (The basics, letters, operators, connectives)

Published: 2013/04/07

Channel: teachphilosophy

How Can One Greek Letter Help Us Understand Language? Lambda Calculus

Published: 2016/05/04

Channel: The Ling Space

Presuppositions and two kinds of negation, Marie Duzi

Published: 2017/08/07

Channel: Copernicus Center for Interdisciplinary Studies

What Is The Referential Theory Of Meaning?

Published: 2017/09/09

Channel: Funny Question

Propositional Logic: Syntax and Truth Values

Published: 2016/01/12

Channel: Artificial Intelligence

Part 2: Symbolic Logic (WFFs & calculating truth functional statements)

Published: 2013/04/07

Channel: teachphilosophy

What is PROOF-THEORETIC SEMANTICS? What does PROOF-THEORETIC SEMANTICS mean

Published: 2017/04/29

Channel: The Audiopedia

Truth condition

Published: 2016/09/19

Channel: Wikivoicemedia

A Child and a Puppet: How Children Learn Language

Published: 2015/12/04

Channel: UConn

What Does Entailment Mean In Logic

Published: 2017/11/05

Channel: Bestry Belo

What Is A Proposition In Philosophy?

Published: 2017/07/21

Channel: top sparky

What Is A Proposition Examples?

Published: 2017/07/21

Channel: top sparky

What Is The Definition Of Entailment?

Published: 2017/07/03

Channel: sparky marketips

Negation of Proposition, Mathematical Logic, Propositions, Conjunction | 17

Published: 2015/03/23

Channel: Gate Instructors

Douglas Patterson - Theory and Concept in Tarski's Philosophy of Language

Published: 2016/05/18

Channel: just_Cire

Semantics types of meaning

Published: 2015/11/13

Channel: สุวลี สมุทรเขตร์

6.2 Truth Functions Part 1

Published: 2016/05/02

Channel: Melvin Sanchez

HTML semantics: meaningless elements

Published: 2015/01/17

Channel: Thomas Bradley

What Does Entailment Mean In Logic?

Published: 2017/07/03

Channel: sparky marketips

Iraq: Mission Accomplished - Or Just Semantics and Broken Promises?

Published: 2010/08/30

Channel: RonPaul2008dotcom

Obama admin plays 'combat' semantics in deadly Afghan attack

Published: 2016/01/06

Channel: Fox News

In formal semantics, **truth-value semantics** is an alternative to Tarskian semantics. It has been primarily championed by Ruth Barcan Marcus,^{[1]} H. Leblanc, and M. Dunn and N. Belnap.^{[2]} It is also called the *substitution interpretation* (of the quantifiers) or substitutional quantification.

The idea of these semantics is that universal (existential) quantifier may be read as a conjunction (disjunction) of formulas in which constants replace the variables in the scope of the quantifier. E.g. ∀xPx may be read (Pa & Pb & Pc &...) where a,b,c are individual constants replacing all occurrences of x in Px.

The main difference between truth-value semantics and the standard semantics for predicate logic is that there are no domains for truth-value semantics. Only the truth clauses for atomic and for quantificational formulas differ from those of the standard semantics. Whereas in standard semantics atomic formulas like Pb or Rca are true if and only if (the referent of) b is a member of the extension of the predicate P, respectively, if and only if the pair (c,a) is a member of the extension of R, in truth-value semantics the truth-values of atomic formulas are basic. A universal (existential) formula is true if and only if all (some) substitution instances of it are true. Compare this with the standard semantics, which says that a universal (existential) formula is true if and only if for all (some) members of the domain, the formula holds for all (some) of them; e.g. ∀xA is true (under an interpretation) if and only if for all k in the domain D, A(k/x) is true (where A(k/x) is the result of substituting k for all occurrences of x in A). (Here we are assuming that constants are names for themselves—i.e. they are also members of the domain.)

Truth-value semantics is not without its problems. First, the strong completeness theorem and compactness fail. To see this consider the set {F(1), F(2),...}. Clearly the formula ∀xF(x) is a logical consequence of the set, but it is not a consequence of any finite subset of it (and hence it is not deducible from it). It follows immediately that both compactness and the strong completeness theorem fail for truth-value semantics. This is rectified by a modified definition of logical consequence as given in Dunn and Belnap 1968.^{[2]}

Another problem occurs in free logic. Consider a language with one individual constant c that is nondesignating and a predicate F standing for 'does not exist'. Then ∃xFx is false even though a substitution instance (in fact **every** such instance under this interpretation) of it is true. To solve this problem we simply add the proviso that an existentially quantified statement is true under an interpretation for at least one substitution instance in which the constant designates something that exists.

- Game semantics
- Kripke semantics
- Proof-theoretic semantics
- Quasi-quotation
- Truth-conditional semantics

None of the audio/visual content is hosted on this site. All media is embedded from other sites such as GoogleVideo, Wikipedia, YouTube etc. Therefore, this site has no control over the copyright issues of the streaming media.

All issues concerning copyright violations should be aimed at the sites hosting the material. This site does not host any of the streaming media and the owner has not uploaded any of the material to the video hosting servers. Anyone can find the same content on Google Video or YouTube by themselves.

The owner of this site cannot know which documentaries are in public domain, which has been uploaded to e.g. YouTube by the owner and which has been uploaded without permission. The copyright owner must contact the source if he wants his material off the Internet completely.

Wikipedia content is licensed under the GFDL and (CC) license