|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Elections to the United States House of Representatives in 1902 occurred in the middle of President Theodore Roosevelt's first term, about a year after the assassination of President William McKinley in September 1901.
Due to the increase in the size of the House, both Roosevelt's Republican Party and the opposition Democratic Party gained seats. The Democrats increased their share of the House, but not by enough to regain control. With a stable economy and no cornerstone issue, Democratic gains can mostly be linked to the effects of redistricting. Many of the new seats were in areas that featured a high number of immigrants, either Eastern and Southern Europeans industrial workers or Northern European farmers. New immigrant groups trended Democratic. The Populist Party disappeared from the House, with its supporters almost unanimously switching to the Democratic Party. Notable freshmen included future Vice President and Speaker John Nance Garner (D-Texas).
Contents |
29 new seats were added in reapportionment following the 1900 Census.[2] No states lost seats, 16 had no change in apportionment, 14 gained 1 seat, 3 gained 2 seats, and 3 gained 3 seats. Two of the states that gained representation elected the new seat at-large.
| State | Type | Total seats |
Republican | Democratic | Silver Republican | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seats | Change | Seats | Change | Seats | Change | Seats | Change | ||
| Alabama | District | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0 | ||||
| Arkansas | District | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | ||||
| California | District | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | ||||
| Colorado | District +at-large[3] |
3[4] | 2 | 0 | 1 | ||||
| Connecticut | District +at-large[3] |
5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Delaware | At-large | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| Florida | District | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | ||||
| Georgia | District | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0 | ||||
| Idaho | At-large | 1[4] | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Illinois | District | 25 | 17 | 8 | 0 | ||||
| Indiana | District | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| Iowa | District | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| Kansas | District +at-large |
8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Kentucky | District | 11 | 1 | 10 | 0 | ||||
| Louisiana | District | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | ||||
| Maine[5] | District | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Maryland | District | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| Massachusetts | District | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| Michigan | District | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| Minnesota | District | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| Mississippi | District | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | ||||
| Missouri | District | 16 | 1 | 15 | 0 | ||||
| Montana | At-large | 1[4] | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Nebraska | District | 6[6] | 5 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| Nevada | At-large | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| New Hampshire | District | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| New Jersey | District | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | ||||
| New York | District | 37 | 20 | 17 | 0 | ||||
| North Carolina | District | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | ||||
| North Dakota | District[7] | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Ohio | District | 21 | 17 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| Oregon[5] | District | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Pennsylvania | District[8] | 32 | 28 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| Rhode Island | District | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| South Carolina | District | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | ||||
| South Dakota | At-large | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Tennessee | District | 10 | 2 | 8 | 0 | ||||
| Texas | District | 16 | 0 | 16 | 0 | ||||
| Utah | At-large | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Vermont[5] | District | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Virginia | District | 10 | 1 | 9 | 0 | ||||
| Washington | At-large | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| West Virginia | District | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Wisconsin | District | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| Wyoming | At-large | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Total | 386 | 209 54.1% |
176 45.8% |
1 0.3% |
|||||
The previous election had 5 Populists, which party completely disappeared in the 1902 elections.
Three states, with 8 seats between them, held elections early in 1902:
Party abbreviations:
| District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California 1 | Samuel D. Woods Redistricted from the 2nd district |
Republican | 1900 | Retired Republican hold |
James N. Gillett (R) 50.5% Thomas S. Ford (D) 46.7% M. E. Shore (S) 1.9% W. O. Clark (Pr) 0.9% |
| California 2 | Frank Coombs Redistricted from the 1st district |
Republican | 1900 | Lost re-election Democratic gain |
Theodore A. Bell (D) 49.2% Frank Coombs (R) 48.3% G. H. Rogers (S) 1.7% W. P. Fassett (Pr) 0.8% |
| California 3 | Victor H. Metcalf | Republican | 1898 | Re-elected | Victor H. Metcalf (R) 66.2% Calvin B. White (D) 27.7% M. W. Wilkins (S) 5% T. H. Montgomery (Pr) 1.1% |
| California 4 | Julius Kahn | Republican | 1898 | Lost re-election Democratic gain |
Edward J. Livernash (D) 49.2% Julius Kahn (R) 48.7% William Costley (S) 1.9% Joseph Rowell (Pr) 0.2% |
| California 5 | Eugene F. Loud | Republican | 1890 | Lost re-election Democratic gain |
William J. Wynn (D) 56.5% Eugene F. Loud (R) 41.2% Joseph Lawrence (S) 1.5% Frank W. Caton (Pr) 0.7% |
| California 6 | James C. Needham Redistricted from the 7th district |
Republican | 1898 | Re-elected | James C. Needham (R) 53.5% Gaston N. Ashe (D) 42.5% J. L. Cobb (S) 2.5% L. C. Jolley (Pr) 1.4% |
| California 7 | James McLachlan Redistricted from the 6th district |
Republican | 1900 | Re-elected | James McLachlan (R) 64.8% Carl A. Johnson (D) 27% George H. Hewes (S) 4.2% Frederick F. Wheeler (Pr) 4% |
| California 8 | None (District created) | New district Republican gain |
Milton J. Daniels (R) 51.9% William E. Smythe (D) 40.8% Noble A. Richardson (S) 5.4% Ellsworth Leonardson (Pr) 2% |
||
| District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florida 1 | Stephen M. Sparkman | Democratic | 1894 | Re-elected | Stephen M. Sparkman (D) 100% |
| Florida 2 | Robert Wyche Davis | Democratic | 1896 | Re-elected | Robert Wyche Davis (D) 100% |
| Florida 3 | None (District created) | Democratic win | William B. Lamar (D) 100% | ||
| District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina 1 | William Elliott | Democratic | 1886 1896 |
Retired to run for the Senate Democratic hold |
George Swinton Legaré (D) 95.5% Aaron P. Prioleau (R) 4.5% |
| South Carolina 2 | W. Jasper Talbert | Democratic | 1892 | Retired to run for Governor Democratic hold |
George W. Croft (D) 94.9% W. S. Dixon (R) 5.0% Others 0.1% |
| South Carolina 3 | Asbury Latimer | Democratic | 1892 | Retired to run for the Senate Democratic hold |
Wyatt Aiken (D) 98.9% John Scott (R) 1.1% |
| South Carolina 4 | Joseph T. Johnson | Democratic | 1900 | Re-elected | Joseph T. Johnson (D) 98.7% L. W. C. Blalock (R) 1.3% |
| South Carolina 5 | David E. Finley | Democratic | 1898 | Re-elected | David E. Finley (D) 99.3% C. P. T. White (R) 0.7% |
| South Carolina 6 | Robert B. Scarborough | Democratic | 1900 | Re-elected | Robert B. Scarborough (D) 100% |
| South Carolina 7 | Asbury F. Lever | Democratic | 1901 (special) | Re-elected | Asbury F. Lever (D) 96.2% Alexander D. Dantzler (R) 3.8% |
|
||||||||
Here you can share your comments or contribute with more information, content, resources or links about this topic.